The First African Slaves Were Transported to the New World in What Year?
/https://tf-cmsv2-smithsonianmag-media.s3.amazonaws.com/filer/72/d8/72d8725e-b5e1-4f2b-ada5-7c9bb345ca56/c3rnjh.jpg)
In 1619, "20. and odd Negroes" arrived off the coast of Virginia, where they were "bought for victualle" by labor-hungry English colonists. The story of these captive Africans has prepare the stage for countless scholars and teachers interested in telling the story of slavery in English language Northward America. Unfortunately, 1619 is not the best place to begin a meaningful inquiry into the history of African peoples in America. Certainly, there is a story to be told that begins in 1619, just it is neither well-suited to help united states of america understand slavery as an institution nor to help u.s.a. amend grasp the complicated identify of African peoples in the early modernistic Atlantic world. For too long, the focus on 1619 has led the general public and scholars alike to ignore more of import issues and, worse, to silently accept unquestioned assumptions that go along to touch usa in remarkably consequential ways. As a historical signifier, 1619 may be more insidious than instructive.
The overstated significance of 1619—even so a common fixture in American history curriculum—begins with the questions most of us reflexively ask when nosotros consider the first documented arrival of a handful of people from Africa in a place that would one solar day become the United states of America. Showtime, what was the status of the newly arrived African men and women? Were they slaves? Servants? Something else? And, second, as Winthrop Hashemite kingdom of jordan wondered in the preface to his 1968 archetype,White Over Blackness, what did the white inhabitants of Virginiathink when these dark-skinned people were rowed ashore and traded for provisions? Were they shocked? Were they frightened? Did they notice these people were black? If so, did they care?
In truth, these questions fail to approach the subject of Africans in America in a historically responsible fashion. None of these queries conceive of the newly-arrived Africans every bit actors in their ain right. These questions also assume that the arrival of these people was an exceptional historical moment, and they reflect the worries and concerns of the globe we inhabit rather than shedding useful calorie-free on the unique challenges of life in the early seventeenth century.
There are important historical correctives to the misplaced marker of 1619 that can help us enquire better questions near the past. Most manifestly, 1619 was non the showtime time Africans could be plant in an English Atlantic colony, and it certainly wasn't the first time people of African descent made their marking and imposed their will on the land that would someday be function of the United States. Equally early on as May 1616, blacks from the W Indies were already at piece of work in Bermuda providing expert noesis nearly the tillage of tobacco. In that location is also suggestive evidence that scores of Africans plundered from the Spanish were aboard a fleet under the command of Sir Francis Drake when he arrived at Roanoke Island in 1586. In 1526, enslaved Africans were function of a Spanish expedition to constitute an outpost on the North American coast in nowadays-day South Carolina. Those Africans launched a rebellion in November of that year and effectively destroyed the Spanish settlers' ability to sustain the settlement, which they abased a year later. About 100 years before Jamestown, African actors enabled American colonies to survive, and they were every bit able to destroy European colonial ventures.
These stories highlight additional problems with exaggerating the importance of 1619. Privileging that date and the Chesapeake region effectively erases the retention of many more African peoples than information technology memorializes. The "from-this-indicate-forward" and "in-this-place" narrative arc silences the memory of the more than than 500,000 African men, women, and children who had already crossed the Atlantic against their volition, aided and abetted Europeans in their endeavors, provided expertise and guidance in a range of enterprises, suffered, died, and – nearly importantly – endured. That Sir John Hawkins was behind four slave-trading expeditions during the 1560s suggests the caste to which England may take been more than invested in African slavery than we typically recollect. Tens of thousands of English men and women had meaningful contact with African peoples throughout the Atlantic world before Jamestown. In this light, the events of 1619 were a bit more yawn-inducing than we typically permit.
Telling the story of 1619 every bit an "English" story besides ignores the entirely transnational nature of the early modern Atlantic globe and the manner competing European powers collectively facilitated racial slavery even as they disagreed nigh and fought over near everything else. From the early 1500s forward, the Portuguese, Spanish, English, French, Dutch and others fought to control the resources of the emerging transatlantic world and worked together to facilitate the dislocation of the indigenous peoples of Africa and the Americas. As historian John Thornton has shown united states, the African men and women who appeared nearly every bit if past run a risk in Virginia in 1619 were there because of a chain of events involving Portugal, Kingdom of spain, holland and England. Virginia was role of the story, but it was a blip on the radar screen.
These concerns about making also much of 1619 are probable familiar to some readers. Only they may not fifty-fifty be the biggest problem with overemphasizing this i very specific moment in time. The worst aspect of overemphasizing 1619 may be the way it has shaped the black experience of living in America since that fourth dimension. As we near the 400th anniversary of 1619 and new works appear that are timed to remember the "firstness" of the arrival of a few African men and women in Virginia, information technology is of import to remember that historical framing shapes historical meaning. How we cull to characterize the past has important consequences for how nosotros think about today and what we tin imagine for tomorrow.
In that calorie-free, the most poisonous result of raising the drapery with 1619 is that information technology casually normalizes white Christian Europeans as historical constants and makes African actors lilliputian more than dependent variables in the effort to empathize what it means to be American. Elevating 1619 has the unintended consequence of cementing in our minds that those very same Europeans who lived quite precipitously and very much on expiry'south doorstep on the wisp of America were, in fact, already home. Simply, of course, they were not. Europeans were the outsiders. Selective memory has conditioned u.s. to utilize terms likesettlers andcolonists when we would be better served by thinking of the English equallyinvaders oroccupiers. In 1619, Virginia was still Tsenacommacah, Europeans were the non-native species, and the English language were the illegal aliens. Dubiousness was still very much the society of the twenty-four hour period.
When we make the error of fixing this place in time as inherently or inevitably English, we prepare the footing for the supposition that the United States already existed in embryonic way. When we allow that idea to go unchallenged, we silently disregard the notion that this identify is, and always has been, white, Christian, and European.
Where does that exit Africans and people of African descent? Unfortunately, the same insidious logic of 1619 that reinforces the illusion of white permanence necessitates that blacks can merely exist,ipso facto, aberrant, impermanent, and only tolerable to the caste that they adapt themselves to someone else's fictional universe. Remembering 1619 may exist a way of accessing the memory and dignifying the early presence of blackness people in the identify that would become the United States, but it likewise imprints in our minds, our national narratives, and our history books that blacks are non from these parts. When we elevate the events of 1619, we establish the conditions for people of African descent to remain, forever, strangers in a strange country.
Information technology doesn't have to be this way. We shouldn't ignore that something worth remembering happened in 1619. In that location are certainly stories worth telling and lives worth remembering, simply history is also an practise in crafting narratives that give phonation to the past in society to appoint with the present. The year 1619 might seem long ago for people more attuned to the politics of life in the 21st century. But if nosotros tin can do a amend job of situating the foundational story of black history and the history of slavery in North America in its proper context, then perchance we tin clear an American history that doesn't essentialize notions of "us" and "them" (in the broadest possible and diverse understandings of those words). That would be a pretty good start step, and it would go far much easier to sink our teeth into the rich and varied issues that continue to roil the world today.
This story was originally published on Blackness Perspectives , an online platform for public scholarship on global blackness thought, history and culture.
Source: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/misguided-focus-1619-beginning-slavery-us-damages-our-understanding-american-history-180964873/
0 Response to "The First African Slaves Were Transported to the New World in What Year?"
Postar um comentário